jadensababe505 jadensababe505
  • 22-05-2018
  • Social Studies
contestada

When warning users about the dangers of products, writers should avoid using mandatory language such as must and shall?

Respuesta :

andriansp andriansp
  • 31-05-2018
I believe the answer is: False

Mandatory language is actually advisable to be used in this situation.
Using mandatory language would set a clear limitation that make the consumers understand the magnitude of the danger. This would make them much more likely to follow the written warning.
Answer Link

Otras preguntas

What was the significance of the Sacco-Vanzetti trial? (5 points) It established capital punishment. It established important legal principles. The crime was un
Which statement about printing is false? A)It helped revive interest in classical Roman and Greek art. B)It made books accessible to people and motivated them t
How do write 2/100000 as a decimal
Which are Buddhist beliefs? Choose all answers that are correct. A. "Right living" through meditation and compassion for others can free a person of desire and
Which value for x makes the open sentence true? 9 • 8 – 2x + x2 ≥ x3 + x2 A: 7 B: 6 C: 5 D: 4
The slope of a line is undefined, and the x-intercept is -7. What is the equation of the line?
What issues resonate across cultures, and how are arguments developed in response?
why was the Soviet launch of Sputnik a turning point in US history?
why was the Soviet launch of Sputnik a turning point in US history?
what times what equals 3000